Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for December 3rd, 2007

Newsbusted

Courtesy, Newsbusters and the Media Research Center.

Read Full Post »

scare-bear-2.jpgscare-bear-1.jpg

This is the SCARE Bear. or SCAIR Bear.

Scare Bear – Scare Bear has many hats. Sympathizer, Talking Head and even Film Producer. Whether its phony protests, fighting cartoons, blaming Israel or filming atrocities for Allah, Scare Bear is ready to indulge the Western media.

Get them while they’re hot, from Rude News.

Hat tip: Ms. U.

Reference: Teddy Bear Jihad in the Sudan, and jihadists incensed that a schoolteacher would name a Teddy Bear “Mohammed.”

Read Full Post »

Chavez’s defeat

chavezdefeated.jpgVenezuelans cheered.

Hugo Chavez was trying desperately to drag Venezuelans to a socialist state so he could be dictator. Apparently Venezuelans were not willing to go there with him.

I’m sure the Cindy Sheehans of the world who embrace the idea of socialism openly with her Lynn Stewart-adoring comrades, is upset about this tonight…

CARACAS, Venezuela — Humbled by his first electoral defeat ever, President Hugo Chavez said Monday he may have been too ambitious in asking voters to let him stand indefinitely for re-election and endorse a huge leap to a socialist state.

“I understand and accept that the proposal I made was quite profound and intense,” he said after voters narrowly rejected the sweeping constitutional reforms by 51 percent to 49 percent.

Opposition activists were ecstatic as the results were announced shortly after midnight — with 88 percent of the vote counted, the trend was declared irreversible by elections council chief Tibisay Lucena.

Some shed tears. Others began chanting: “And now he’s going away!”

Without the overhaul, Chavez will be barred from running again in 2012.

I’m sure they’re all happy he’s going away, but they may discover, just like Hitler and other socialist/fascists, it isn’t easy to make a pinko go away…they keep coming back like a bad penny.

It is odd that this article where Hugo Chavez is so calm…reminds me of this article where Hillary Clinton is so calm. They must have the same script writers. Either that, or socialists are full of calm where the media is concerned. So full of calmness. Exuding calm, peace and tranquility and let’s just break out in a couple of choruses of ‘give peace a chance’.

Read Full Post »

AWOL, that’s where.

They’re really not about women’s rights at all. In the face of Islamic extremism that encourages female mutiliation, beating women and honor killing, they remain completely silent. In the Sudan, as the story of the condemned British schoolteacher, Gillian Gibbons unfolds about the muslim/Islamic backlash for her naming a teddy bear Mohammed, American feminists STILL remain silent. And the backlash has been significant-some were calling for Ms. Gibbons’ death while rioting in the streets. Tammy Bruce points out feminists’ unwillingness to stand up for Gibbons:

There has been appropriate international outrage over the treatment of Gibbons, from virtually everyone except American “feminists.” Multiple Muslim groups in the U.K. have condemned the sentence. Even the popular little boy in Mrs. Gibbons’ class who suggested the name for the bear came to her defense, explaining that he named the bear after himself.

Yet, when asked by FOX News for a comment about the situation, a National Organization for Women spokeswoman said they were “not putting out a statement or taking a position.”

How politically correct of her.

This is how depraved the American left has become. A little Muslim boy in Sudan shows more courage and conviction for a woman under fire than a bunch of women sitting in Washington, D.C., who preen themselves on being the premiere “advocates” for women.

It’s been apparent for years that the American feminist establishment is nothing more than a shill for the shallow leftists in the Democrat party, wrapping themselves in the feminist label for convenience. Groups like NOW and Eleanor Smeal’s Feminist Majority, also amazingly silent in the past five years about Islamic terrorism and violence against women, use women’s issues as nothing more than slogans and chants in their efforts to gain political power.

It’s all about power and money to leftists, anyway…as long as it’s not their money.

Compare a schoolteacher naming a Teddy Bear “Mohammed” with suicide bombers named “Mohammed”. Then ask yourself why the schoolteacher is insulting the prophet using that name and the suicide bombers aren’t. (Bruce, 2007)

X Posted at CB

Read Full Post »

This is a great article at Frontpage Magazine, written by John Loftus.

The inescapable conclusion is this: Saddam really did have WMD after all, but not in the way the Bush administration believed. A 9,000 word research paper with citations to each captured document has been posted online at LoftusReport.com, along with translations of the captured Iraqi documents, courtesy of Mr. Ryan Mauro and his friends.

Unfortunately, when you go to Loftus’ website, there is music playing in another language, and you have to pay for the report, but this is what he says about the documentation of what happened to Saddam’s WMD, in part:

This Iraqi document research has been supplemented with satellite photographs and dozens of interviews, among them David Gaubatz who risked radiation exposure to locate Saddam’s underwater WMD warehouses , and John Shaw, whose brilliant detective work solved the puzzle of where the WMD went. Both have contributed substantially to solving one of the most difficult mysteries of our decade.

The absolutists on either side of the WMD debate will be more than a bit chagrinned at these disclosures. The documents show a much more complex history than previously suspected. The “Bush lied, people died” chorus has insisted that Saddam had no WMD whatsoever after 1991 – and thus that WMD was no good reason for the war. The Neocon diehards insist that, as in Raiders of the Lost Ark, the treasure-trove is still out there somewhere, buried under the sand dunes of Iraq. Each side is more than a little bit wrong about Saddam’s WMD, and each side is only a little bit right about what happened to it.

I’m very tempted to get it, even though I’ll have to pony up with some bucks.

He gives some coordinates that you can use google earth to find, I think I’m going to do that, as well and maybe later on post some pictures of it.

He concludes with:

It is time to utterly reject the conventional wisdom that there were no WMD in Iraq and look to the best evidence: Saddam’s own files on WMD. The truth is what it is, the documents speak for themselves.

X Posted at CB

Read Full Post »

The arguments they come up with are amazing. Seriously.

clipped from www.moonbattery.com

Does Divorce Cause Global Warming?

Here’s news that will horrify Tinseltown glitterpigs, known for their 6-month marriages and righteous belief in global warming: Divorce is bad for the environment.

The Sunday Times reports:

Scientists have quantified for the first time the extent to which divorce damages the environment.

  blog it

X Posted at CB

Read Full Post »