No intellectual diversity here; totalitarian moonbats continue pursuing their agenda to crush the opposition is based on a three-pronged formula. Glenn Beck calls it the Progressives’ three tactics.
It was great to see him put into words what I have been thinking about lately – a complete departure from reason and facts; their backing facts into their preconceived storylines and throwing out the rest. It was already apparent to me at the protests that I’ve attended along with the comments I’ve received on articles I’ve quoted and written about-that the communist/socialist activists think that profit is evil, and the Saul Alinsky tactic of marginalizing their political opponents which stems from an emotionally hysterical nonsensical argument (mostly name-calling) is another. In terms of the global warming scam, healthcare, the financial industry and the auto industry-we certainly we can agree all of these have been presented to us as a crisis – but the moonbatty idea that government is here to fix these things couldn’t be more ridiculous. It’s never fixed any of the things that it’s attempted to do in the past; only made things worse.
The hatred of capitalism is what fuels the evil profits argument; but what I don’t understand is – these evil profits are what companies invest into R&D, which at some point produces new products and product and medical technology, cures, and improvements. We all stand to benefit from that; and so does the rest of the world. R&D is not cheap. But sadly, when companies enter hard times, it’s often one of the first areas to be cut. America is the only nation that I’m aware of that generates tremendous technological advances; breakthroughs in medicine; cleaner energy (with no government intervention) and so on. “Progressives” are actually about “regression”, not progress. And even more sad is how they are all about destroying good things that the entire world has relied upon up until this point.
But that is about to change. Case in point: how they want to stop third world countries from developing to “save the environment” based on global warming – which doesn’t exist. The earth is in a state of cooling and has been – since the late 90’s. This horrifying fact is why the IPCC DESTROYED its so-called research.
…reaching a new consensus will be exceedingly difficult because the raw data on which the landmark 1996 United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change based its conclusion has been destroyed.
It’s a deliberate case of sabatoge.
the last step in the scientific method is independent reproduction of results. But lost climate data cannot be reproduced, which is a huge problem for everybody. “Every time CRU massaged the temperature data, they were getting more warming from the same numbers. It’s incumbent upon scientists to find out why, but you can’t find out if you don’t have the data,” Dr. Patrick Michaels, senior fellow in environmental studies at the Cato Institute, told The Examiner. “The data needed to verify the gloom-and-doom warming forecasts have disappeared.”
Foisting a myth upon us in the name of science when it isn’t science at all – is what the REAL scientists have a problem with, because, as it says in the Examiner article-
what has happened is global temperatures have dropped every year since 1998, recent peer-reviewed research has uncovered the decisive influence of hot and cold cycles in the oceans on land temperatures, and growing numbers of scientists with unquestioned credentials are stepping forward to question the conventional wisdom.
They’d better move quickly if Mr. Nobel Peace Prize is going to sign away American Sovereignty and more of our hard-earned money in that environmental scam treaty in Copenhagen in December. In effect, what that will accomplish is to redistribute America’s wealth across the world to third world countries -and the US will be the highest paying country into it. Because it would require the other countries to give the US permission to let it out of the treaty once it’s signed, and they have the most to benefit from the US staying in, we would be in quite a pickle at that point. That treaty will also trump our own constitution and laws – and nowhere in it does it mention anything about “voters”, “voting” or “representation”. This is precisely what we were warned about by our founders with regards to taxation without representation.
Clearly, when moonbats use the three-pronged formula to argue any issue (and yes, they use it in every case)–they’ve moved into what Bezmenov described as the useful idiot category where facts mean nothing anymore. You’re dumb, we’re in a crisis, we need to destroy evil profits (which means crush capitalism).
And this is what we’re faced with now; we’re opposing a group of radicals who don’t see the world as we do; who refuse to acknowledge that you have a point of view; who ridicule and attempt to marginalize you and even call you a liar if you suggest anything different than the party line.
In short; it’s totalitarianism.
But, as Bezmenov also observed, it’s these individuals who will wind up in the concentration camps alongside their political opposition, once their goal of smashing “the evil empire” has been achieved. Yuri Bezmenov was an expert on this – read about him at wikipedia and take a look at the youtube videos of his interview with G. Edward Griffin. So much of what he describes when he talks about his fulfilling the goal of ‘disinformation’ for the Soviets fits the description of the tactics the Obama supporters use.
Reverend Wurmbrand’s story about having been imprisoned in communist Romania for merely being a Christian details what ends up happening to moral people in a communist regime. And they did the same thing-marginalize Christians along with the Jews in Nazi Germany, too. It wasn’t just people of faith-it was even educated people. They rounded up all the so-called intellectuals, teachers, and leftists – and put them away and/or simply shot them.
It is the leftist who will be the worst enemy of the marxist/leninist regime, once they realize the horrors of what this system accomplishes in practice. “Social justice” is an empty buzzword. To each according to his hyphen is the least of anyone’s worries at that point. It’s the hyphens that have merely succeeded in dividing a nation in order for leftists to force upon the population their version of “equality” which isn’t equal at all.
Cao2's Weblog 